CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote operation into the USA

To: Barry W2UP <w2up.co@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote operation into the USA
From: Edward Sawyer <EdwardS@advanced-conversion.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2021 21:03:58 +0000
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Sorry, He would need to use KO1A as his call in order to be compliant.  But he 
did not.

Why would he not use KO1A as required?

Ed  N1UR

From: Barry W2UP <w2up.co@gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2021 4:52 PM
To: Edward Sawyer <EdwardS@advanced-conversion.com>
Cc: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Remote operation into the USA

That one was easy.  Look up the callsign on qrz.com<http://qrz.com>, then do a 
name search.  It also brings up KO1A.

Next...

Barry W2UP

On Thu, Jul 15, 2021 at 2:28 PM Edward Sawyer 
<EdwardS@advanced-conversion.com<mailto:EdwardS@advanced-conversion.com>> wrote:
KO7SS wrote:  "It would be easier to opine on this situation that is bothering 
you if you were to post up the callsigns in question, in public, on this 
reflector. There may be aspects of the details you do not know."

Sure, just an example, IZ3EYZ operating as KE5JSY from likely a third station 
location in the US. (not KE5JSY - although this is quite unclear)  Its simply 
recent and relevant to WRTC qualification.

Ed  N1UR



_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com<mailto:CQ-Contest@contesting.com>
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>