CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Spacing note for RBN users

To: "ON5ZO@hotmail.com" <ON5ZO@hotmail.com>, "cq-contest@contesting.com" <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Spacing note for RBN users
From: AB1J via CQ-Contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Reply-to: ktfrog007@aol.com
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2021 20:09:08 +0000 (UTC)
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
It occurred to me one day that jiggering the spacing to have YT3 decoded 
occasionally as TJ3 might be a nice strategy to attract folks to the YT3 
station.  They go for the TJ3, but it's not there so might as well work the YT3.
In other words, it could be deliberate.
73,Ken, AB1J





-----Original Message-----
From: ON5ZO ON5ZO <ON5ZO@hotmail.com>
To: cq-contest@contesting.com <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Sent: Thu, Apr 22, 2021 7:48 pm
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Spacing note for RBN users

Pete N4ZR says:
"[Skimmer] relies on proper CW spacing to determine what is part of a callsign 
and what isn't"

In December there is the highly enjoyable 9A CW Contest.
For two years in a row my bandmap has been showing a red CQ9A. But there never 
is the Mardeira multiplier when I go listen. Next to the red CQ9A there is 
always a spot for the same station...

There have been quite a few TJ3 spots in the recent contests, each time along 
with a YT3 station...

Circumstantial evidence to prove Pete's point.

73 de Franki ON5ZO = OQ5M
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>