CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] World Wide Digi DX Contest Results

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] World Wide Digi DX Contest Results
From: Paul O'Kane <pokane@ei5di.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2020 12:59:30 +0000
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
On 13/01/2020 20:01, John Geiger W5TD wrote:
I make FT8/FT4 QSOs every day.  Very easy to set up remote operation using
the shack computer and my cellphone so I can make QSOs from work, while
walking around the neighborhood, etc.  It is still exciting to work a DX
station, especially if it is a new one for the CQ DX Marathon for that
year, or a new prefix for the digital modes.  Not a whole lot different
that pushing the voice recorder button to say "59 Oklahoma" several hundred
times in a SSB contest.

This neatly sums up much, as I see it, of what is devaluing ham radio and contesting.  It's the attitude that "because I'm a qualified ham-radio operator, and a reasonable person, anything I do that includes ham-band RF must be ham radio - especially when there's some cool technology involved".

It seems to me that when contacts are machine-to-machine rather than person-to-person, and cannot happen without dependence on a public communications utility (whether cellphone or internet), they become something other than ham-radio contacts.  They are hybrid-communications contacts, plain and simple - an ugly name for an ugly practice, but one that, nevertheless, accurately describes the activity.

The suggestion that such contacts are "not a whole lot different from pushing the voice recorder button . . " indicates the disregard some hams have for reality.  They may be fooling themselves, etc.

73,
Paul EI5DI







_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>