Who "sanctions" 4U1ITU and 4U1UN for examples. 4U1ITU has been in many
contests, not sure of in CW WW contests, but I'm >99.44% sure that it
is one of the "HQ" stations for the IARU World Championship contest held
every year. Maybe, if IARU and the Untied Nations is disqualified,
perhaps the every four year World Championship contest needs to be
disqualified.
Or, maybe, just maybe, someone in charge of the CQ Contests should
consult with reps of the Contest Community, like Oh Fishy Alls of the
RAC, WIA, LABRE, ARRL, the RSGB, the DARC, the Russian Amateur Radio
Union (sorry folks, I don't have a Cyilic Alphabet Handy, and don't
remember much of my college Russian anyway, JARL, et. cetera, and get a
mutual opinion rather than an arbitrary (and in my estimation,
capricious) judgement on the subject of 4U1 prefix calls.
I personally don't know if ITU, IARU, or the Untied Nations issues these
calls, but they been in use since before I was licensed (shortly after
sp*rk was banned), so i'd think that at least one or two of the ham
radio fraternity must believe they are legitimate calls.
Lettuce be reasonable. Lettuce knot pic nits. If the holder of 4U1WB
is NOT operating from the UN HQ, or a building leased by the Untied
Nations, there may be a very fine point. I don't know these details.
Or, maybe we'll "strip" all he contacts which have been made with these
calls from all records. And, declare that the World Championship is a
sham because IARU claims to sponsor it, and the IARU is NOT a National
organization?
However, whatever the decision, it will be a consensus decision, rather
than that of one person.
72/73 de n8xx Hg
QRP >99.44% of the time
CQ contests needs to consult with representativesOn 10/27/2017 5:52 PM,
cq-contest-request@contesting.com wrote:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2017 14:51:12 -0500
From: Zack Widup<w9sz.zack@gmail.com>
To: CQ Contest<cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Why was 4U1WB Disqualified in the CQ WPX
Contest?
Message-ID:
<CANJxhWj3y4tyKHcg+vJVCkcb1JgJVrzpNgxwc9YMSq3_pb57iw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
How do they happen to be operating with that callsign, then? Is it illegal for
them to use that callsign?
Inquiring minds want to know.
73, Zack W9SZ
On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 2:02 PM, Terry Zivney<n4tz@arrl.net> wrote:
Why was 4U1WB Disqualified in the CQ WPX Contest?
As Masa, AJ3M, noted in his posting about the
disqualification of 4U1WB in the 2017 CQ WPX SSB
contest, I informed him that:
"4U1WB violated rule V.C.2:
2. Special event, commemorative, and other unique prefix stations are
encouraged to participate. Prefixes must be assigned by the licensing authority
of the country of operation.
4U1 is not assigned by the FCC, the licensing authority of the USA, which is what
the log of 4U1WB showed as the country of operation."
*********
The WPX contest rule cited clearly states that the callsign must be assigned by
the licensing authority. The FCC did not assign the callsign, and has no
authority to issue 4U1WB callsigns. Thus, the station did not operate in
compliance with the existing contest rules.
Since 4U1 prefixes can be in multiple countries, rule V.C.1 would also apply.
The DXCC list includes 4U1UN and 4U1ITU as separate entities. So, the 4U1
prefix does not denote the country of operation. This rule states:
"A station operating from a DXCC entity different from that indicated by its call
sign is required to sign portable." Because the 4U1WB callsign does not reflect the
DXCC entity of USA, it is required to sign portable.
I did not write these rules, but was charged with interpreting and enforcing
them.
---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|