CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] DC in NAQP, WHY?

To: cq-contest <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] DC in NAQP, WHY?
From: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Reply-to: k9yc@arrl.net
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2017 14:30:53 -0800
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Only one of which managed to get on the air in RTTY RU.

73, Jim K9YC

On Tue,1/10/2017 11:10 AM, Richard F DiDonna NN3W wrote:
Lets see....

W3DQ

KE3X

NN3RP

K3VOA

4U1WB

W3HAC

To name a few...

73 Rich NN3W


On 1/10/2017 1:25 PM, Jim Brown wrote:
I have exactly the same question. Modern cities are a terrible place to try to do ham radio. I don't know of a single contest station within the city of San Francisco; AB9H and WO9S operate one of two contests from the city of Chicago. I lived and operated from a mixed residential/industrial neighborhood in Chicago, and my station was more modest than that of W3DQ. DC was a multiplier in RTTY RU, and it appears that W3DQ was the only DC station on the air.

73, Jim K9YC

On Mon,1/9/2017 5:02 PM, Oliver Sweningsen wrote:
There was a decision on including DC as a multiplier for NAQP. At who's
suggestion and, who made the decision to alter the rules?


There are many who would like to know, just why the change was made.


Who will benefit?

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest


_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest


_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>