| To: | cq-contest@contesting.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Absurd Rule in NAQP |
| From: | Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com> |
| Reply-to: | k9yc@arrl.net |
| Date: | Sun, 17 Jan 2016 13:16:33 -0800 |
| List-post: | <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com> |
On Sun,1/17/2016 11:02 AM, Steve London wrote: The activity level in both NAQP CW and NAQP SSB is already very high. You never run out of folks to work in NAQP. That was NOT EVEN CLOSE to being true at my QTH, especially on SSB. 73, Jim K9YC _______________________________________________ CQ-Contest mailing list CQ-Contest@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Absurd Rule in NAQP, Pete Smith N4ZR |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Absurd Rule in NAQP, KU7Y |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Absurd Rule in NAQP, Steve London |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [CQ-Contest] Absurd Rule in NAQP, KU7Y |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |