CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] The mess I stirred up!

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] The mess I stirred up!
From: Geoffrey Way <wayg@cape-vision.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 17:54:49 -0500
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
I would put things in this context:

A running station "occupies" the frequency, and "holds" on to its use until one of two things occurs--

They "default" from it by failing to safeuguard against its occupancy by another operator for any of a myriad of reasons: failure to respond in timely fashion to queries if it is in use, equipment malfunction/failure, loss of propagation, house has caught fire, family emergency, etc.

-or-

They willingly RELINQUISH it.

The scenario which gave rise to this robust discussion argues over what defines the "default", or if it was or wasn't one. In Tree's case, there was a most regrettable equipment problem which he tried his best to resolve in the shortest possible time based on his judgment of the conditions of the moment on the run frequency and what was attainable with his equipment.

From each of us, there may be a spectrum of viewpoints, and many of them are valid, given what each individual experience has been. We see our truths based on what we know and have learned.

If K3KU were feeling philanthropic, perhaps he'd relinquish, and say "Tree, you OWE me one."

If he were feeling hardcore competitive, he'd make Tree pay, and not respond to him under the notion that Tree had defaulted through his technical lock-up. He would begin running anyone EXCEPT Tree for the next few Q's to assert that he now "occupies" the frequency, and that N6TR has lost it out of default by his technical hang-up.

Such is the field of competition, and radio contesting. If our practices and methods are truly unfair, selfish, or intentionally counterproductive, we might end up getting very few answers to our CQ's. If they are considerate and generous, let the pileups be deep.

I had an occurrence of a different sort on this same situation. A south american was running, and when I answered, his report cut out mid-sentence. So I gave it a few seconds, and gave my report, adding his signal had cut out, please repeat.

...Silence.

I repeated, and still silence. I sent his call followed by mine as to re- establish a QSO, and nothing.

So I set about running, and worked for about 8 minutes and eventually the south american answered my CQ. I told him I was glad to hear him back OK, and that I'd kept the frequency for him, he was welcome to resume with it. But apparently he wasn't too strong with English, and I barely know much more than "Gracias" and "Por Favor" of Spanish. I think in the end neither of us stayed, we both walked away from it. I know I left it before he did. It wasn't long before I was running elsewhere on another band.

-- KA1IOR

 "Style is a simple way of saying complicated things."  --J. Cocteau


              \    /
            ---\--/----
                 /
              ======
           \  |    |   ---Tao.   A chinese character that
           -- |----|                means "Way, Path."
            / |----|
            \ |____|
            /_________                  Geoffrey Way

     websites: http://www.cape-vision.com/wayg/mrep
               http://www.cape-vision.com/wayg/ka1ior



_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>