CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Incomplete SS exchange

To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Incomplete SS exchange
From: Paul O'Kane <pokane@ei5di.com>
Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2011 15:54:57 +0000
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
On 08/11/2011 11:59, Nate Bargmann wrote:

> I can't find on the ARRL site where the rules say one thing and the
> example another.  Both are exactly the same in this canonical document:


You have to look slightly further.  The official
Cabrillo specifications for SS logs do not reflect the
ARRL's rules - callsigns appear once only in Cabrillo
QSO records.

http://www.kkn.net/~trey/cabrillo/qso-template.html
http://www.kkn.net/~trey/cabrillo/sweepstakes.txt

No callsigns are recorded among the exchange elements.
They are, of course, required somewhere, and they appear
in the Cabrillo "Info Sent" fields, in exactly the same
positions as the callsigns in all other contests.

Regardless of the original intent of the exchange, SS
is just another contest and there's no merit in having
built-in redundancy in any contest exchange.  After all,
who would send their section or precedence twice?

73,
Paul EI5DI



_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>