CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] CW & SSB NA Sprint Scores

To: cq-contest@contesting.com, John Reilly <reillyjf@comcast.net>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CW & SSB NA Sprint Scores
From: RT Clay <rt_clay@bellsouth.net>
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 17:46:15 -0700 (PDT)
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
In most SSB contests, the extra qso's come from casual ops (not serious 
contesters). Because of the Sprint QSY rule, you work very few casual ops 
during the contest. 

It just happens that the participation is higher for CW Sprint than SSB Sprint, 
so CW scores are higher as well.

Tor
N4OGW/5

--- On Tue, 9/28/10, John Reilly <reillyjf@comcast.net> wrote:

> From: John Reilly <reillyjf@comcast.net>
> Subject: [CQ-Contest] CW & SSB NA Sprint Scores
> To: cq-contest@contesting.com
> Date: Tuesday, September 28, 2010, 11:11 AM
>   At the risk of being laughed
> off the reflector, I have a question: In 
> the September NA Sprint contests, the CW scores were
> significantly 
> higher than the SSB scores. WHY? In all other contests, its
> the other 
> way around. What is different about a Sprint that gives CW
> operators a 
> QSO advantage?
>    - 73, John, N0TA
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> 

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>