CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Help on CQ WPX entry

To: "'Hank Greeb'" <n8xx@arrl.org>, <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Help on CQ WPX entry
From: "Randy Thompson K5ZD" <k5zd@charter.net>
Reply-to: k5zd@charter.net
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2010 00:20:15 -0000
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Cabrillo v2 uses 

ARRL-SECTION:

Cabrillo v3 uses

LOCATION:

The good news is that the robot will accept either one for either version!
So take your pick.  And thanks for submitting your log.

Randy, K5ZD
 

-----Original Message-----
From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com
[mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Hank Greeb
Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2010 6:50 PM
To: cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: [CQ-Contest] Help on CQ WPX entry

Does CWQPX cabrillo entry require

ARRL-SECTION: MI

as part of the header?

the eggzamplel on http://www.cqwpx.com/cabrillo.htm has
LOCATION: MI

but no

ARRL-SECTION: MI

The robot accepted my entry without complaint but without the

ARRL-SECTION: MI

but with
LOCATION: MI

It gave me a response, but did NOT include the
LOCATION: MI

as part of the response.  This confuses a not contester LID like me, because
I want to submit everything correctly,

Would someone please advise this LID whether the

ARRL-SECTION: MI

is required?

Thanx in advance

73 de n8xx Hg (who is seriously thinking of applying for W8LID as a vanity
call) _______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>