Just when did ham radio contesting stop being about having fun?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Wayne Mills" <n7ng@bresnan.net>
To: "Kelly Taylor" <theroadtrip@mts.net>, cq-contest@contesting.com
Sent: Saturday, January 16, 2010 12:47:24 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Did I cheat in NAQP CW?
Yep! Not me! Me too! Yep!
My solution has been to redefine my participation. It's working for me.
73, Wayne, N7NG
Jackson Hole
-----Original Message-----
From: Kelly Taylor [mailto:theroadtrip@mts.net]
Sent: Friday, January 15, 2010 9:16 PM
To: Wayne Mills; cq-contest@contesting.com
Cc: wayg@cape-vision.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Did I cheat in NAQP CW?
And of course, that raises another question:
If writing the rules will take a team of lawyers, then each of us will have
to consult with our $300-per-hour legal beagles to understand them.
Is that the kind of hobby we want?
I didn't get in to this so lawyers would get rich. If that's where we're
going, stop the bus and let me off.
Most of the rules were fine when we couldn't sit here and nitpick them to
death as armchair barristers. The key is to stop over-analyzing.
73, kelly
ve4xt
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|