CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Were we talking about rule changes?

To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Were we talking about rule changes?
From: "Randy Thompson K5ZD" <k5zd@charter.net>
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 13:15:47 -0000
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
 The url was too long to fit on one line.  Try this one.  
http://tinyurl.com/yanlf24



> -----Original Message-----
> From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com 
> [mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Randy 
> Thompson K5ZD
> Sent: Friday, November 20, 2009 1:07 PM
> To: cq-contest@contesting.com
> Subject: [CQ-Contest] Were we talking about rule changes?
> 
> I had planned to do a summary writeup of the feedback 
> received on the WPX rules changes, but fortunately for me, 
> Cousin QRM, the very efficient secretary of the LIDS society, 
> has already published the full results on the Fi-Ni Report.
> 
> http://fi-ni-report.blogspot.com/2009/11/minutes-of-october-li
> ds-meeting.htm
> l
> 
> 
> Thanks to everyone for their comments and suggestions.  Keep 
> them coming.
> 
> Randy, K5ZD
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>