CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] SS SSB And Your Callsign In The Exchange

To: "CQ-Contest Reflector" <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] SS SSB And Your Callsign In The Exchange
From: "Ward Silver" <hwardsil@gmail.com>
Reply-to: Ward Silver <hwardsil@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 09:28:54 -0800
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
> When posting to cq-contest, I try to be precise, and careful
> in my choice of words, so that readers will focus on the point
> I'm trying to make rather than trivia.

That's why you're such a good programmer :-)

> I've checked the meaning of "handicap".  One definition is -
>
>   "a race or other contest in which certain disadvantages of
>   weight, distance, time, etc., are placed upon competitors"
>
> Being obliged to say/send the callsign one extra time
> (compared to other HF contests) is a disadvantage of time.
> As such, it is a handicap.  It is one that, in SS, applies
> equally to all entrants.  Actually, now that I think about
> it, it's more of a handicap for those with long callsigns.

Your definition is incomplete.  Handicaps are applied unequally to all 
competitors with the goal of producing an equalized competitive environment. 
Requirements that apply equally to all competitors are not handicaps.  Just 
because the game is hard, or inefficient, does not make it unfair.

The remedy for long call signs is not in changing the exchange, it is in the 
participant obtaining a shorter call sign from one's licensing authority. 
You have done quite well in this regard, Mssr Dit :-)

> In order to play in this contest you have to make a required
> sequence of noises according to the contest rules.

And to be more precise myself, the required element is a set of noises, not 
a sequence.  The order of noises is not specified by the rules, but the list 
of noises is explicit.

> I was quoted above as saying "Is it time to review this rule?".

And the contest's Contest Manager (K5KA) has responded, "No," although one 
can always write the appropriate ARRL official.  Have at it!  The continued 
popularity of Sweepstakes indicates that it is not broken and really does 
not need to be fixed.  As N6TR suggests, vote with your presence on the air.

If one likes short exchanges, the ultimate in that regard will occur on the 
29th and 30th.  See you all there!

73, Ward N0AX 

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>