CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Skimmer for S/O in IARU

To: George Fremin III <geoiii@kkn.net>,Michael Coslo <mjc5@psu.edu>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Skimmer for S/O in IARU
From: <ve4xt@mts.net>
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 16:49:35 -0500
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Having done my share of paper logging in my past, and winning the Can-Am 
contest and WPX (for 
Canada), I can most assuredly say that computer logging has NOT been a huge 
boost to score. I guess I 
adopted the "just shut up and work 'em" mantra to dupes long before real-time 
duping was convenient, 
as VV and I only duped a log after the contest. There was no penalty to work 
dupes, merely to leave 
them in the log. So rather than sit there with a half-acre of paper in front of 
me, we just worked. And 
worked. And, largely, worked just as quickly as if we'd had a computer.

Where computers have made life easier is in letting the amps and logger track 
the radio, or dial in the 
correct azimuth on the rotator based on the prefix sitting in the callsign 
field...

Is that assistance? No, because even the rule that says "of any kind" limits it 
to "DX alerting assistance."

Does a system, local or not, that shows you who is where, constitute DX 
alerting? Yes. Should it be 
assistance? I believe it should. Some may disagree. But, to use the words of 
one of the more strident 
(one could say "objectionable") debaters to this thread, let me put this in 
words a first grader could 
understand: we're not all going to agree on something, but that doesn't mean we 
should be degrading 
to others in presenting our view.

Freedom of speech, it seems, only goes as far as someone has the good sense to 
not say anything.

73, kelly
ve4xt




_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>