CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Rule Change Debate on Skimmer

To: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Rule Change Debate on Skimmer
From: k3bu@optimum.net
Reply-to: k3bu@optimum.net
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 02:56:32 +0000 (GMT)
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
> W4TV wrote:

> I am not advocating for unlimited use of networked skimmers 
> in multiple locations any more that I am advocating that 
> single operators be allowed to use remote transmitters or 
> receivers. However, as long as the technology is located 
> in the 500 foot/meter circle with the rest of the station 
> hardware it does not constitute "assistance" under any 
> reasonable definition of assistance. Assistance has always 
> meant the contribution of ANOTHER PERSON whether it be on 
> site (multi-operator) or remote (packet/internet/etc.). 
> 


Exactemundo!
 
It is another person or another skimmer, swimmer etc. outside of one's shack 
that constitutes assistance whatever.
 
Lets look at the "crime" that skimmer would bring:
 
1. Enhances contester's station, another technological gadget, tool to make the 
operator more efficient if he can master it to advantage and not to be a 
wheelchair.
 
2. What a relief from the packet racket. It works in own shack, with own 
antennas and equipment and not serving spots from Siberia about JAs on 80m. 
Pileups would be more sequenced, instead of huge pileup after packet spot. 
(Hate that stuff when QRP, you find the station CQing with no takers, you try 
to call him, only to see some multi finding and working it and posting it on 
packet. Then the hell breaks lose and you can wait for half an hour for pile up 
to die or DX fade away.)
 
3. Is it going to be more fun for casual contesters? Seems that yes. The result 
would be more activity, more points.
 
4. I can't wait for flood of skimmery ops. Just find good frequency, CQ and let 
the skimmers roll and find me and bring the points. I would not need one 
myself, just decent antennas and learn touch typing.
 
5. The "old" rules did not anticipate the skimmers, just feeding the 
information from outside of your station, by ANOTHER op. If the skimmer can 
flood your screen with 1000 spots and you can work them all, more power to you. 
 
6. So using skimmer should be outlawed for SO, but 3 point Af/SA scoring or 
ZERO points for your own huge country is OK?
 
7. Just think what promotes activity and spirit of single operator - boy and 
his toys, without someone else sticking his nose into it (assisting).
 
8. Networked or packeted skimmers is ANOTHER ops toy, and could be actually 
"good" thing, flooding the packets, overloading them and maybe making them 
useless. 
 
9.  I can't wait for next skimmery contest, just program it to mark my call in 
red, ring the bell and work me first, when they find me. Ya'll should get one 
and use it!

Yuri, K3BU.us with tenitis QRMing my human receptions
 
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>