CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Contesting using remote stations

To: cq-contest reflector <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Contesting using remote stations
From: Michael Coslo <mjc5@psu.edu>
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2008 09:01:38 -0400
List-post: <cq-contest@contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
On Mar 16, 2008, at 12:12 AM, Eric Hilding wrote:

> Bob, K0RC, wrote:
>
>> So what's the consensus? Remote stations can't participate in  
>> contesting? If
>> that's the ultimate decision, I need to start selling my  
>> equipment, now,
>> while it still has some value.
>
> If remote stations are banned, I'm also out of here - I'd sell $25K  
> worth of stuff collected so far for a remote site operation vs.  
> losing $400K+ in value drop if I had to sell my house in a  
> depressed market to move out of this heavily CC&R'd County before  
> the sunspot cycle ramps up.

Exactly what are the "unfair" advantages of a remote station? It  
seems to me that there might be some significant *disadvantages* to  
remote contest operation.



-73 de Mike N3LI -


_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>