CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] Incorrect conclusions about un-assisted versusassisted

To: "CQ-Contest" <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Incorrect conclusions about un-assisted versusassisted
From: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 18:03:12 -0800
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Hi Tree

Definately a little pistol here.  I think maybe the reason that the top op's 
don't use packet is that they are the beacons on the band.  They stay in one 
spot and CQ for hours and get great rates, so they don't have to use packet 
to find mults, the mults find them.

In my case, CQ'ing doesn't usually last all that long and I end up going 
S&P.  Then I look at the bandmap.  I look for the mults, they don't come 
looking for me :-)  73
Tom W7WHY


> So - I am not sure what SO2R has to do with the fact that more >serious 
> operators enter unassisted than assisted.


_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>