CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [CQ-Contest] CW segments

To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CW segments
From: "David Robbins K1TTT" <k1ttt@arrl.net>
Reply-to: k1ttt@arrl.net
Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2006 18:52:59 -0000
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Right, generals can not operate cw in the extra only ssb (or cw)
allocations.  So yes, generals lost 150kc of cw space on 80m that went to
extra and advanced ssb (or cw of course).


David Robbins K1TTT
e-mail: mailto:k1ttt@arrl.net
web: http://www.k1ttt.net
AR-Cluster node: 145.69MHz or telnet://dxc.k1ttt.net
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:cq-contest-
> bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Dallas and Lucy
> Sent: Saturday, October 14, 2006 13:28
> To: cq-contest@contesting.com
> Subject: [CQ-Contest] CW segments
> 
> 
> In looking at the frequency allocation chart on the ARRL web, it appears
> that advanced and generals cannot operate CW except 3525-3600 and on their
> authorized phone segments.  That is to say that a general cannot operate
> CW
> in the segment from 3600 to 3800 and an advanced cannot operate CW from
> 3600
> to 3700.  (The same principle applies on the other bands).  Is this a
> correct assumption?  This would appear to give Extras another 100 kHz of
> exclusive CW.  I thought that one could operate CW anywhere except that
> exclusive 25 kHz at the bottom of the band.
> 
> Dallas W3PP
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>