CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

[CQ-Contest] No Dit-Dit (was Sending Speed)

To: "cq-contest reflector" <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Subject: [CQ-Contest] No Dit-Dit (was Sending Speed)
From: "Hal Offutt" <hal@japancorporateresearch.com>
Date: 17 Sep 2006 05:55:05 -0700
Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 08:54:43 -0400
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
Rather than seeing this practice as rude, I take it as a compliment when an
experienced Sprinter does not send "dit-dit" after I send my information. He
is saying, in effect, "I think you are a good enough operator to understand
that I have copied your exchange and don't need to acknowledge.  If I hadn't
copied your exchange, I would have asked for a fill."

The absence of a response is the acknowledgement..

73,

Hal W1NN


----- Original Message -----
From: "Dale Martin" <kg5u@hal-pc.org>
To: <cq-contest@contesting.com>
Sent: Saturday, September 16, 2006 9:18 AM
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Sending Speed


>
>> many Qs, the pileup didn't begin until AFTER I sent  a
>> dit-dit or a di-dah-dit.
>>
>> If it was deliberate, it's good practice for a sprint.
>>
>
> Thanks for the 'di-dit', Kelly (and everyone else who sent 'di-dit' to ack
> the report).
>
>
> A wouf hong across the brow to the two or three ops who left the QRG
> without
> so much as a 'dit' to ack my report.
>
> I deleted them from the log not knowing if they lost me in the QRM and
> moved
> on, or if they got the exchange and were simply being rude not ack'ing the
> report.
>
>
> 73,
> Dale, kg5u
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest



_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>