or maybe base the category on ERP, like the FCC does for 60 meters.
73s John NE0P
---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
From: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 09:07:08 -0800
>ORIGINAL MESSAGE:
>
>At 07:30 PM 1/25/2006, John Geiger (NE0P) wrote:
>
>>Wouldn't a single element wire also include a rhombic?
>>
>>73s John NE0P
>
>
>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
>It sure would. This shows how carefully things have to be worded when
>making rules.
>
>Perhaps stating the gain equivalent would be better, i.e. "An antenna
>with gain equivalent to a half-wave dipole or a 1/4 wave vertical
>worked against ground".
>
>73, Bill W6WRT
>_______________________________________________
>CQ-Contest mailing list
>CQ-Contest@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|