CQ-Contest
[Top] [All Lists]

[CQ-Contest] {Spam?} RES: M/2 Rule

To: 'Roger Huntley' <snr.huntley@verizon.net>,cq-contest@contesting.com
Subject: [CQ-Contest] {Spam?} RES: M/2 Rule
From: PY5EG <py5eg@inepar.com.br>
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 07:31:51 -0300
List-post: <mailto:cq-contest@contesting.com>
The rules request 2 logs one for each station.
The majority of the committee understand that a 3rd or any number of
stations  is allowed, but only maximum of two signals at a given time.
I'm personally against that. I understand that only two stations should be
allowed.
73
Oms 

-----Mensagem original-----
De: cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com
[mailto:cq-contest-bounces@contesting.com]Em nome de Roger Huntley
Enviada em: quinta-feira, 15 de setembro de 2005 00:14
Para: cq-contest@contesting.com
Assunto: [CQ-Contest] M/2 Rule


Under M/2 operation can you use a separate mult station (being transmitter
No. 3) if that mult station does not operate at the same time as both of the
two normal run stations?

And if you can use the third station can that station log the mult contact
on their computer or does the run station that stopped running need to
switch to the mult station frequency and make the QSO in their log?

Roger, W7VV


_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [CQ-Contest] {Spam?} RES: M/2 Rule, PY5EG <=