On Tue, 2004-06-08 at 19:27, Jeff Maass wrote:
> As hard as it seems to be for the EUHFC rule
> promulgators to believe, there are a *lot* of
> contesters still who use one or more radios without
> computer interfaces (unmodified TS930, TS940, TS830,
> C-Line, etc.), especially as second radios. Manually
> recording exact frequency for each QSO would be slow
> and inefficient. Requiring it is not presenting a
> level playing field for all participants.
Maybe it's time for a bit of creative civil disobedience?
I suggest we all simply ignore this new rule. Operate the same way you
would have if it didn't exist; submit your Cabrillo file the same way
you would have.
Surely having to disqualify most of the entries will send a pretty
strong message?
Even if it doesn't... to be honest, how many of us *really* operate for
the wallpaper? Will we really enjoy this contest less if they choose to
DQ us on the back end?
--
Doug Smith W9WI
Pleasant View (Nashville), TN EM66
http://www.w9wi.com
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|