> This has been discussed in russian reclectors many times. A
"hacker"
> or possible cheater will not deal with hard copies, but sure will
try
> with the scan files. So the hard copies are the first line of
defence
> :)
I would not speak for "hacker" unless I am a hacker :)
> IS> Besides, my license is already on eqsl.cc
>
> And what? I had uploaded my logs to the e-qsl and and received
about
> 200 confirmation requests for the QSOs never been made. I even
could
> "confirm" them.
So what? I have qsl cards asking me to confirm contacts that were
never made. Don''t see it as valid argument.
> IS> I thought the whole idea is to avoide using post office in
the
> IS> beginning of the 21st century whenever possible.
>
> The whole idea is to protect the system of profanation and
unnecessary
> simplification.
Then it is done in a wrong way. I know dosens of contesters here who
would never bother to go through all this hassle.
> IS> So for the time being I will continue sending updates of my log
to
> IS> my QSL manager who does not require my sending him photocopy
of
> IS> passport and license by snail mail.
>
> You are fighting the mills. Is it really THAT hard to send
them
> photocopies?
Yes it is. Besides, I like fighting mills. Some good people did it in
the past and gained admiration of others.
> IS> 73, Igor UA9CDC
> --
> 73...Art RX9TX 20-May-04 13:47 UTC
>
> "Real knowledge is to know the extent of ones ignorance."
[Confucius]
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
|